BOURNE AGAINMEDIAStart HereStart with a direct answer. Examine the Scripture, follow the reasoning, and see where questions remain.
6 answers
Genesis describes a large vessel carrying representatives of animal kinds. That is the usual explanation within a worldwide-flood reading, but the Bible does not give an animal count or enough practical detail to prove that every required animal could fit and survive.
Read the explanation and Scripture →Genesis names Cain’s wife but never identifies her parents. If Adam and Eve are understood as the sole first human couple, the straightforward inference is that she was a sister or another close relative. That relationship is inferred, not explicitly stated.
Read the explanation and Scripture →Genesis presents the flood as judgment on a world filled with violence and corruption. That explains the reason the narrative gives; it does not remove the painful question of why the judgment includes children and animals.
Read the explanation and Scripture →Genesis 22 identifies the command as a test, and the story ends with God stopping Abraham and providing a ram. Isaac is not sacrificed. The test concerns Abraham’s trust, but its terrifying form remains a genuine moral difficulty.
Read the explanation and Scripture →The Bible does not give one explanation for every instance of suffering. It rejects the claim that suffering always proves personal wrongdoing. Christian faith holds that God confronts evil and will finally overcome it, while leaving many individual “why” questions unanswered.
Read the explanation and Scripture →In Mark 3, Jesus gives this warning when religious teachers attribute his liberating work to an unclean spirit. The context concerns a hardened rejection of the Spirit’s work, not an accidental phrase, an unwanted thought, or an honest question.
Read the explanation and Scripture →